The Great Debate: Postmortem

Well. That was thorough.

It’ll probably take me about a week to write up my commentary on The Great Debate. It will be broken into two or three parts, since there is a lot of ground to cover. Also, it won’t be just me — Surak will handle one aspect of the material (the probability argument) and I will handle the other (the nature of science argument).

Meanwhile, after two hours and twenty minutes of rousing debate about the deepest questions of existence, this is my frame of mind:

(Click to enlarge.)

Off to do some wallowing.

Related posts:

Want to discuss this article? See 'Questions and Comments' for the rules.

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s