In which we discuss the specific ‘scientific’ reason for my conversion to Christianity.
Thank you for making the story of your conversion to Christianity public. I am a Christian apologist who is using your story as a discussion point in a meetup I am holding. One of the atheists that is attending is asking what specific scientific reasons (not philosophical or theological) you found most compelling in your conversion. The article mentions your work on deuterium abundances as well as your amazement that the universe is comprehensible. Do you have any other scientific reasons that I could share with the group that you find compelling?
My conversion was a two-step process that took place over many years. I first went from atheism to theism, and then after a few years, I went from theism to Christianity. The former was completely unexpected; the latter was a very deliberate process.
You will have to explain to your atheist attendee that you cannot separate science from philosophy, so there was no ‘purely scientific’ reason for my conversion. What specifically led me to believe in God was the idea best expressed by Einstein when he said, “The most incomprehensible thing about the universe is that it is comprehensible.”
Through my research in cosmology, I got an overwhelming sense of a universe that is so rational that it’s as though it wanted to be understood. I had a specific question I was trying to answer with my research — how much of the universe is comprised of ordinary matter* — and it shocked me when I realized not only how answerable the question was, but that there was no reason it had to be this way. How is it even possible to have a rational universe without some kind of rational cause? I realized that by far the best explanation for the existence of the universe is that it was caused by a personal, rational, transcendent being of some kind. At that time, I called this personal cause “God,” but didn’t have any specific religious beliefs beyond God as the Creator.
Note that this is not a God of the gaps argument or an argument from incredulity, which is how atheists often try to spin it. It’s simply the most rational explanation, and I had no choice but to accept it on that basis. If you want to understand this explanation in greater depth, William Lane Craig has some good articles and videos on the philosophical argument that the cause of the universe has to be a personal being.
It was that realization that took me from atheism to theism. What took me from theism to Christianity was mostly Gerald Schroeder’s book, The Science of God, which I highly recommend. After reading the first four chapters in particular, I reasoned that the odds of Genesis not being divinely inspired were so low as to be effectively impossible. Once I realized that Genesis was, contra the odds, rather scientifically accurate for a thousands year-old document, I began investigating the rest of the Bible and specifically the evidence for the gospels. I came to the conclusion that the best explanation, given the evidence, is that the gospels were true, so I accepted Jesus on that basis.
* One of these days I’m going to write a post about the details of the research project and how it ultimately led to my conversion.
Amen! We, as Christians, need to give atheists (or even agnostics) more evidence (or motivation… I don’t know what the word is for it) as why they need to move from theism to Christianity. In other words, why should a theist choose Christianity over other monotheistic or polytheistic religions (it might seem cumbersome, since there are more than 4000 religions; however, I think choosing the ‘major ones’, most ‘popular ones’ or even choosing to compare Christianity to a few of the popular religions would suffice?).
The most difficult task will be trying to convince the new Christian to remain a nondenominational Christian while he/she is reading & studying the Word. Then, he/she can review the different Christian denominations to see what type of church or denomination he/she wants to join/be part of?
WLC goes straight to Christianity, and why one should choose Christ (WLC doesn’t particularly concerns others with the different religions. But on his website, WLC does mention why he isn’t a Catholic, Mormon, etc.).
What’s your take on this argument, is it actually scientificly correct?